Yesterday was Halloween and since it fell on a Saturday, it left me with a lot of time on my hands. When I have idle time, I think. I remember. And realizing that this could well be my youngest son's last Halloween to celebrate as a "kid", I became somewhat nostalgic. And as I pondered over the many Halloweens that have come and gone, it brought to mind something that happened last year. Since I haven't written anything in months, I thought it would be the perfect opportunity to put my thoughts to paper, so to speak.
A week before Halloween last year, I found myself in the grocery store and came across a cute little girl that decided to introduce herself to me. She was simply precious and begin to babble non-stop as most toddlers do. It was awesome! I love little kids and since mom was right by her side, I decided to play along with her cheerful banter. We were laughing hysterically and things were going great until I made an unexpected mistake in the form of a question,
"So, what are you going to be for Halloween?" I expected my ears to be met with a cute little giggle followed by an excited declaration of
"A princess!" or
"Elsa!", "A Minion!" Maybe
"A fairy!" What I didn't expect was the confused look on her face as she ran to the safety of her mom and grabbed he leg.
"We don't celebrate Halloween!", mom said with a very self-determined and delightful scowl.
It kind of caught me off guard so I just responded with a cliche
"Oh, really?", coming to the realization that I was possibly about to step into territory that was going to send my "Cynical Meter" off the charts.
"No!", she snapped back, as if I had asked an incredibly stupid question.
"It's an evil holiday! And we're Christians!" Duh! Now why the hell didn't they teach me that in seminary?
I stood there with a tad of disbelief and almost became ashamed of myself for not holding myself to the same self-righteous standards as this upstanding woman. It's amazing how a precious dialogue with a four year old could turn into me feeling like a child molester, or worse yet, a heretic. Man, thanks mom! I felt like just going to go home, burying myself under the covers and refusing to come out until it was time to drown my sorrows in afternoon coffee! But no! I wasn't about to allow this mean lady ruin my day! Time to have a little fun!
"Well, then Happy Reformation Day to you and your sweet little girl!"
"Reformation Day? What's is that?", she answered back, with that scrunchy confused face that you used to get from your mom when you said something stupid.
I couldn't help but laugh, shook my head and walked away with a polite wave. As I made my way to the front door I heard her mumble something to her four year old, followed by an annoyed,
"Idiot!"
"Ignore that, Jake! Ignore it! What would Jesus do? Let it go!" I did. And you'll be happy to know that the swelling in my hand from punching the steering wheel in my car went down by the end of the day. "Serenity now! Serenity now!"
To be honest, I've never understood the Christian fear and panic over Halloween. I always say that if The Devil needs a vacation, he takes it on Halloween. We create enough anxiety fueled damage on our own. And if you choose not to celebrate Halloween, please don't take my words as judgmental. My frustration is with the grouchy woman in the grocery store and her failed attempt at Christ-likeness. But let me encourage you! If you need a reason to keep your porch light on and your front door open next year, just declare
"Happy Reformation Day" and give the cute kiddos some candy in honor of Martin Luther. And in keeping with the scary theme of the day, just recite something from Luther's speech at the Diet of Worms. Oooooooh! Scary!
On October 31, 1517, Martin Luther nailed his 95 Theses to the door of the
Castle Church in Wittenburg Germany. In the striking of a nail, a shock
wave was sent through the Church and the world. In essence, this was
the beginning of the Protestant Reformation, and how we got to where we
are today. Although I have not always agreed with Luther's theology and practices, this day marks a critical juncture in Church history.
The 95 Theses was not a rejection on the Church, but a rejection of the
validity of the sale of indulgences (remissions of temporal punishment
due for sins which have already been forgiven), that were becoming
rampant in the Church. The document also viewed with great cynicism the practice
of indulgences being sold, and thus the penance for sin representing a financial transaction rather than genuine contrition.
Luther argued that this was a gross violation of the original
intention of confession and penance, and that Christians were being
misled by being told that they could find absolution for a mere monetary sacrifice.
You
may have heard the expression,"
As soon as the coin in the coffer rings,
the soul from purgatory springs."? Luther insisted that forgiveness was
God's alone and thus could not be bought for oneself, or anyone else
for that matter, through an earthly system of absolution. This kind of
thought would thus limit a Christian's relationship with God and lessen
their devotion to him alone. Luther contended that if salvation was by "grace alone" (Romans 3:20-28), what could man do in order to earn their own salvation, let alone that of another.
If you haven't read
Luther's 95 Theses, I've posted them below. It's long, but worth the read. It's important to be reminded of these essential movements in the Church
that give us the freedom to do what we do and further the Kingdom of God. Imagine the faith and
courage that Luther had to have to rebel against the Church and thus
chose to honor God rather than man. The system that the Church had instituted with the sale of
indulgences was built of fear. Remember the words if
1 John 4:16 that say
"God is
love...There is no fear in love. But perfect love drives out fear,
because fear has to do with punishment. The one who fears is not made
perfect in love."
Martin Luther's 95 Theses
"Out
of love for the truth and from desire to elucidate it, the Reverend
Father Martin Luther, Master of Arts and Sacred Theology, and ordinary
lecturer therein at Wittenberg, intends to defend the following
statements and to dispute on them in that place. Therefore he asks that
those who cannot be present and dispute with him orally shall do so in
their absence by letter. In the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, Amen."
- When our Lord and Master Jesus Christ said, ``Repent''
(Mt 4:17), he willed the entire life of believers to be one of
repentance.
- This word cannot be understood as referring to the sacrament of
penance, that is, confession and satisfaction, as administered by
the clergy.
- Yet it does not mean solely inner repentance; such inner repentance
is worthless unless it produces various outward mortification of
the flesh.
- The penalty of sin remains as long as the hatred of self (that is,
true inner repentance), namely till our entrance into the kingdom
of heaven.
- The pope neither desires nor is able to remit any penalties except
those imposed by his own authority or that of the canons.
- The pope cannot remit any guilt, except by declaring and showing
that it has been remitted by God; or, to be sure, by remitting
guilt in cases reserved to his judgment. If his right to grant
remission in these cases were disregarded, the guilt would
certainly remain unforgiven.
- God remits guilt to no one unless at the same time he humbles him in
all things and makes him submissive to the vicar, the priest.
- The penitential canons are imposed only on the living, and,
according to the canons themselves, nothing should be imposed on
the dying.
- Therefore the Holy Spirit through the pope is kind to us insofar as
the pope in his decrees always makes exception of the article of
death and of necessity.
- Those priests act ignorantly and wickedly who, in the case of the dying, reserve canonical penalties for purgatory.
- Those tares of changing the canonical penalty to the penalty of
purgatory were evidently sown while the bishops slept (Mt 13:25).
- In former times canonical penalties were imposed, not after, but before absolution, as tests of true contrition.
- The dying are freed by death from all penalties, are already dead as
far as the canon laws are concerned, and have a right to be
released from them.
- Imperfect piety or love on the part of the dying person necessarily
brings with it great fear; and the smaller the love, the greater
the fear.
- This fear or horror is sufficient in itself, to say nothing of
other things, to constitute the penalty of purgatory, since it is very
near to the horror of despair.
- Hell, purgatory, and heaven seem to differ the same as despair, fear, and assurance of salvation.
- It seems as though for the souls in purgatory fear should necessarily decrease and love increase.
- Furthermore, it does not seem proved, either by reason or by
Scripture, that souls in purgatory are outside the state of merit,
that is, unable to grow in love.
- Nor does it seem proved that souls in purgatory, at least not all of
them, are certain and assured of their own salvation, even if we
ourselves may be entirely certain of it.
- Therefore the pope, when he uses the words ``plenary remission of
all penalties,'' does not actually mean ``all penalties,'' but only
those imposed by himself.
- Thus those indulgence preachers are in error who say that a man is
absolved from every penalty and saved by papal indulgences.
- As a matter of fact, the pope remits to souls in purgatory no
penalty which, according to canon law, they should have paid in
this life.
- If remission of all penalties whatsoever could be granted to anyone
at all, certainly it would be granted only to the most perfect,
that is, to very few.
- For this reason most people are necessarily deceived by that
indiscriminate and high-sounding promise of release from penalty.
- That power which the pope has in general over purgatory corresponds
to the power which any bishop or curate has in a particular way in
his own diocese and parish.
- The pope does very well when he grants remission to souls in
purgatory, not by the power of the keys, which he does not have,
but by way of intercession for them.
- They preach only human doctrines who say that as soon as the money
clinks into the money chest, the soul flies out of purgatory.
- It is certain that when money clinks in the money chest, greed and
avarice can be increased; but when the church intercedes, the
result is in the hands of God alone.
- Who knows whether all souls in purgatory wish to be redeemed, since
we have exceptions in St. Severinus and St. Paschal, as related in a
legend.
- No one is sure of the integrity of his own contrition, much less of having received plenary remission.
- The man who actually buys indulgences is as rare as he who is really penitent; indeed, he is exceedingly rare.
- Those who believe that they can be certain of their salvation
because they have indulgence letters will be eternally damned,
together with their teachers.
- Men must especially be on guard against those who say that the
pope's pardons are that inestimable gift of God by which man is
reconciled to him.
- For the graces of indulgences are concerned only with the penalties of sacramental satisfaction established by man.
- They who teach that contrition is not necessary on the part of those
who intend to buy souls out of purgatory or to buy confessional
privileges preach unchristian doctrine.
- Any truly repentant Christian has a right to full remission of penalty and guilt, even without indulgence letters.
- Any true Christian, whether living or dead, participates in all the
blessings of Christ and the church; and this is granted him by God,
even without indulgence letters.
- Nevertheless, papal remission and blessing are by no means to be
disregarded, for they are, as I have said (Thesis 6), the
proclamation of the divine remission.
- It is very difficult, even for the most learned theologians, at one
and the same time to commend to the people the bounty of
indulgences and the need of true contrition.
- A Christian who is truly contrite seeks and loves to pay penalties
for his sins; the bounty of indulgences, however, relaxes penalties
and causes men to hate them -- at least it furnishes occasion for
hating them.
- Papal indulgences must be preached with caution, lest people
erroneously think that they are preferable to other good works of
love.
- Christians are to be taught that the pope does not intend that the
buying of indulgences should in any way be compared with works of
mercy.
- Christians are to be taught that he who gives to the poor or lends
to the needy does a better deed than he who buys indulgences.
- Because love grows by works of love, man thereby becomes better. Man
does not, however, become better by means of indulgences but is
merely freed from penalties.
- Christians are to be taught that he who sees a needy man and passes
him by, yet gives his money for indulgences, does not buy papal
indulgences but God's wrath.
- Christians are to be taught that, unless they have more than they
need, they must reserve enough for their family needs and by no
means squander it on indulgences.
- Christians are to be taught that they buying of indulgences is a matter of free choice, not commanded.
- Christians are to be taught that the pope, in granting indulgences,
needs and thus desires their devout prayer more than their money.
- Christians are to be taught that papal indulgences are useful only
if they do not put their trust in them, but very harmful if they
lose their fear of God because of them.
- Christians are to be taught that if the pope knew the exactions of
the indulgence preachers, he would rather that the basilica of St.
Peter were burned to ashes than built up with the skin, flesh, and bones
of his sheep.
- Christians are to be taught that the pope would and should wish to
give of his own money, even though he had to sell the basilica of
St. Peter, to many of those from whom certain hawkers of indulgences
cajole money.
- It is vain to trust in salvation by indulgence letters, even though
the indulgence commissary, or even the pope, were to offer his soul
as security.
- They are the enemies of Christ and the pope who forbid altogether
the preaching of the Word of God in some churches in order that
indulgences may be preached in others.
- Injury is done to the Word of God when, in the same sermon, an equal
or larger amount of time is devoted to indulgences than to the
Word.
- It is certainly the pope's sentiment that if indulgences, which are
a very insignificant thing, are celebrated with one bell, one
procession, and one ceremony, then the gospel, which is the very
greatest thing, should be preached with a hundred bells, a hundred
processions, a hundred ceremonies.
- The true treasures of the church, out of which the pope distributes
indulgences, are not sufficiently discussed or known among the
people of Christ.
- That indulgences are not temporal treasures is certainly clear, for
many indulgence sellers do not distribute them freely but only
gather them.
- Nor are they the merits of Christ and the saints, for, even without
the pope, the latter always work grace for the inner man, and the
cross, death, and hell for the outer man.
- St. Lawrence said that the poor of the church were the treasures of
the church, but he spoke according to the usage of the word in his
own time.
- Without want of consideration we say that the keys of the church, given by the merits of Christ, are that treasure.
- For it is clear that the pope's power is of itself sufficient for the remission of penalties and cases reserved by himself.
- The true treasure of the church is the most holy gospel of the glory and grace of God.
- But this treasure is naturally most odious, for it makes the first to be last (Mt. 20:16).
- On the other hand, the treasure of indulgences is naturally most acceptable, for it makes the last to be first.
- Therefore the treasures of the gospel are nets with which one formerly fished for men of wealth.
- The treasures of indulgences are nets with which one now fishes for the wealth of men.
- The indulgences which the demagogues acclaim as the greatest graces
are actually understood to be such only insofar as they promote
gain.
- They are nevertheless in truth the most insignificant graces when
compared with the grace of God and the piety of the cross.
- Bishops and curates are bound to admit the commissaries of papal indulgences with all reverence.
- But they are much more bound to strain their eyes and ears lest
these men preach their own dreams instead of what the pope has
commissioned.
- Let him who speaks against the truth concerning papal indulgences be anathema and accursed.
- But let him who guards against the lust and license of the indulgence preachers be blessed.
- Just as the pope justly thunders against those who by any means whatever contrive harm to the sale of indulgences.
- Much more does he intend to thunder against those who use
indulgences as a pretext to contrive harm to holy love and truth.
- To consider papal indulgences so great that they could absolve a man
even if he had done the impossible and had violated the mother of
God is madness.
- We say on the contrary that papal indulgences cannot remove the very least of venial sins as far as guilt is concerned.
- To say that even St. Peter if he were now pope, could not grant
greater graces is blasphemy against St. Peter and the pope.
- We say on the contrary that even the present pope, or any pope
whatsoever, has greater graces at his disposal, that is, the
gospel, spiritual powers, gifts of healing, etc., as it is written. (1
Co 12[:28])
- To say that the cross emblazoned with the papal coat of arms, and
set up by the indulgence preachers is equal in worth to the cross
of Christ is blasphemy.
- The bishops, curates, and theologians who permit such talk to be spread among the people will have to answer for this.
- This unbridled preaching of indulgences makes it difficult even for
learned men to rescue the reverence which is due the pope from
slander or from the shrewd questions of the laity.
- Such as: ``Why does not the pope empty purgatory for the sake of
holy love and the dire need of the souls that are there if he
redeems an infinite number of souls for the sake of miserable money with
which to build a church?'' The former reason would be most just;
the latter is most trivial.
- Again, ``Why are funeral and anniversary masses for the dead
continued and why does he not return or permit the withdrawal of
the endowments founded for them, since it is wrong to pray for the
redeemed?''
- Again, ``What is this new piety of God and the pope that for a
consideration of money they permit a man who is impious and their
enemy to buy out of purgatory the pious soul of a friend of God and do
not rather, beca use of the need of that pious and beloved soul,
free it for pure love's sake?''
- Again, ``Why are the penitential canons, long since abrogated and
dead in actual fact and through disuse, now satisfied by the
granting of indulgences as though they were still alive and in force?''
- Again, ``Why does not the pope, whose wealth is today greater than
the wealth of the richest Crassus, build this one basilica of St.
Peter with his own money rather than with the money of poor believers?''
- Again, ``What does the pope remit or grant to those who by perfect
contrition already have a right to full remission and blessings?''
- Again, ``What greater blessing could come to the church than if the
pope were to bestow these remissions and blessings on every
believer a hundred times a day, as he now does but once?''
- ``Since the pope seeks the salvation of souls rather than money by
his indulgences, why does he suspend the indulgences and pardons
previously granted when they have equal efficacy?''
- To repress these very sharp arguments of the laity by force alone,
and not to resolve them by giving reasons, is to expose the church
and the pope to the ridicule of their enemies and to make Christians
unhappy.
- If, therefore, indulgences were preached according to the spirit and
intention of the pope, all these doubts would be readily resolved.
Indeed, they would not exist.
- Away, then, with all those prophets who say to the people of Christ, ``Peace, peace,'' and there is no peace! (Jer 6:14)
- Blessed be all those prophets who say to the people of Christ, ``Cross, cross,'' and there is no cross!
- Christians should be exhorted to be diligent in following Christ, their Head, through penalties, death and hell.
- And thus be confident of entering into heaven through many
tribulations rather than through the false security of peace (Acts
14:22).
